Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 7821 - 7840 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
  These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 5:44 am
” Considering the six non-exhaustive factors set forth in Section 43(c)(2)(B)(i)-(vi), the Board found that opposer would likely suffer an impairment of the distinctiveness of its mark, even though opposer had no current involvement in real estate, since many luxury brands have licensed use of their marks in connection with hotels, and other have found opportunities in related areas, like interior design services and bathroom fixtures.Boi Na Braza, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 3:33 pm by Lucy Reed
The judge states that “What is concerning about this case is that the continued litigation is proving to cause stress, anxiety, upset and confusion to B. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:13 pm
A winning party in trademark cases can generally recover attorney fees only if the case is “exceptional,” but the magistrate concluded that this was indeed an exceptional case (Renna v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 12:56 pm by Andrew Delaney
If A tells B but nothing happens to C, it’s not enough for a defamation suit. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:16 am by Lloyd J. Jassin
  Copyright Office filing deadline & benefits of filing promptly V. [read post]