Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 29,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2019, 5:19 am
In Harris Funeral Home, the Court holds that Title VII covers gender identity per se.Don't take that to Vegas.Finally, two reminders:These cases only matter because Congress has not amended Title VII to expressly cover (or not) sexual orientation or gender identity - Congress can moot these cases at any time and effectively reverse them after the fact; andMany state and local laws prohibit sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination - these cases do not… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:26 am
Reverse Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:28 am
I try my hand at explaining the DC Circuit's Net Neutrality ruling in Mozilla v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
” In September, the parties in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 pm
Zarda / Bostock v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
by Dennis Crouch Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:54 pm
The first morning of the term showed a welcome moment of camaraderie on the bench, as justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum seemed to join in their skepticism of the government’s position in Peter v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over state versions of the ADA, meaning that plaintiffs in two of the hottest states for these lawsuits, California and New York, could keep filing under state law. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am
Kennedy’s swing vote resulted in a few liberal outcomes (notably on same-sex marriage), but Roberts defected from the conservative position only when it came to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which he famously voted to uphold in NFIB v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:51 am
In the main, they rely on the notion that the Tenth Amendment preserves states' "power to tax all property, business, and persons, within their respective limits," Thomson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am
We should add some context before we move on.The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals faced a similar question in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 3:37 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 3:22 pm
” In Nixon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in the current Section 1981 case Comcast v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 1:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
