Search for: "State v. Gaines"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 9,739
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 5:44 am
Duty Free Americas, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:30 am
(As Tyler observes, I sometimes describe controversies as based on state law, as they often are today. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:51 am
Campfield v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:20 am
By Glen Hansen In Schmidt v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 am
Rex Real Estate I, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 1:17 pm
But these are all part of the same information ecology: what would it gain us to have a neutral internet if all the devices we connect to it use DRM to control us to the benefit of distant corporations? [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:04 am
Lease v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
" Let's assume that nowhere in the ordinance is there a provision stating any maximum duration for an activity. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 11:58 am
., Hale v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Arnstein v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
– Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), IP and start-ups: (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property), Innovators: Make sure your company owns the fruits of your open innovation projects: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog), It’s all about the numbers: SuperCrunchers of patent data will gain competitive advantage: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Events 4-9 August: Dept Science & Technology indigenous knowledge systems expo and workshop… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IPKat) United States US General 2005 civil damages awards in state courts rarely broke $1M according to report released by US Justice Department (Law360) Changes to expert witness rules draws critisism (Law360) Collaborative law and intellectual property cases (The IP ADR Blog) Democrats victory could mean a new focus on civil suits (Law360) Election could drastically affect appeals court makeup (Law360) Ethics case survey: when is attorney-client privilege waived? [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 3:26 pm
The question this time, in Facebook v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
13 Nov 2024, 4:30 am
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) R. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:18 pm
Plotkin also contended that the City had “gained de facto control of their property,” resulting in the City being the only buyer for their properties. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:54 pm
Jardines (11-564) and Florida v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:45 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
