Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 7821 - 7840 of 9,940
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2010, 12:37 pm by David Bernstein
For example, every “Progressive” legal commentator who ventured an opinion decried the Supreme Court’s invalidation of residential segregation in Buchanan v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
  While some civil liberty supporters cheered this outcome, the fact that the Canwest decision was not reevaluated means that both Michelin and Canwest represent the current state of copyright law in Canada with respect to the Charter. [read post]
In their press release announcing their legal challenge, Krista Carr, Executive Vice-President of Inclusion Canada stated: People are dying. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 5:02 pm by INFORRM
In this context, a recent decision from the United States is of considerable interest. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:10 am by Scott A. McKeown
 The IEEE has gone as far as to suggest that the recent Supreme Court decision in Stanford v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 8:18 am by INFORRM
The civil liberties campaign group Big Brother Watch has voiced concerns over state enforcement of platforms’ terms and conditions. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:14 am by 1 Crown Office Row
In this context, a recent decision from the United States is of considerable interest. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am by Jamie Markham
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 8:29 am
The argument in Safford United School District v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:07 am by Jamie Markham
We know from many, many appellate cases that being a habitual felon is a status, not a crime, State v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 1:49 pm by Joshua Cossin
” This conflict was resolved in her favor in 2019 in a separate case heard before the ECHR and also titled Khadija Ismayilova v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:29 pm by Alfred Brophy
The struggle in Oklahoma City over racially restrictive covenants stretched from the late 1920s to just after Shelley v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 3:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
And in the political arena, the constitutional debates of the 1940s and '50s seem less relevant today than those of the Progressive era, when liberals first attacked the conservative Court as pro-business, and conservatives insisted that only the Court could defend liberty in the face of an out-of-control regulatory state. [read post]