Search for: "State v. Light" Results 7821 - 7840 of 26,003
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2009, 4:04 am
  Last week, in State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 11:06 am by Richard Renner
S. 164, 168 (2008) (search incident to an arrest that was illegal under state law was reasonable); California v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm by PaulKostro
Innes, 117 N.J. 496, 518 (1990) (stating a settlement agreement should be enforced by a trial court only to the extent it is equitable and just); Miller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dismissal of the legal malpractice counterclaim was warranted because defendant failed to adequately plead proximate causation (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In light of the foregoing, we do not reach the parties’ remaining arguments regarding collateral estoppel and failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by PaulKostro
The Court stated that “while motions for leave to amend are to be determined without consideration of the ultimate merits of the amendment, those determinations must be made in light of the factual situation existing at the time each motion is made. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 2:38 pm
Further, Plaintiff stated that there were no glow-in-the-dark strips on the edge of the platform and there were no lights running along the side of the seats in the Theater. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:52 pm
Jang at 3-4.Court's Request for Briefing on Jurisdictional IssueThis petition for permission to file an interlocutory appeal followed, and we directed the parties to address the jurisdictional question [in light of Gunn v. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:13 am by DONALD SCARINCI
§ 3231 and in light of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:48 pm
While keeping his submissions brief in light of the fact that a number of cases had already been dealt with by Mr. [read post]