Search for: "State v. Saide"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 57,127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2007, 11:56 am
But no one said that immunity always seems fair. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:42 am
In American General Life Ins. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:38 am
In announcing one of the cases from the bench, Justice Antonin Scalia said the day's decisions made it clear that "we consider it part of our business" to sort out the balance between federal and state law. * * * Of Wednesday's pre-emption cases, Riegel v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Justice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:10 am
Justice v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
Justice v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 9:51 am
Recently, in Barrett v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:00 pm
After being arrested, Christy admitted to a State-administered breath-test, which indicated a BAC of .192. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:16 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
(Cites to Erie, State Farm). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am
He noted that, because of his conclusion on reasonable expectation of privacy, this strictly speaking did not arise but nevertheless went on to state his finding. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 8:41 am
He can't help but understand that what I said to Ms. [read post]
27 Jul 2006, 5:25 am
She stated: "Defendant should not be heard now to rely on a presumption that she should have asserted in the divorce court. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
That said, commercial uses can still be fair uses, and can still be parodies. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:57 am
In Sanders v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 9:36 am
” Walker v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 6:33 am
” Clement also said that the state attorney general “forfeited the ability to insist that they have the exclusive right to represent the Commonwealth. [read post]
8 May 2012, 4:38 am
Noting that the employer, in determining that the individual failed to comply with its drug test procedures "implementing federal regulations" governing his eligibility for the position as set out in 49 CFR Part 40, the court said that the employer “cannot have violated state or local discrimination laws by [doing so]," citing Kinneary v City of New York, 601 F3d 151. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 1:25 pm
Stated otherwise, the duty imposed upon a municipality when it undertakes to act in loco parentis is nondelegable (see Bartels v County of Westchester, 76 AD2d 517, 523). [read post]
