Search for: "State v. Word"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 40,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
A few wording changes in the bill’s Definitions section would leave the overall law with a very problematic notice and takedown model for anything that an accuser merely alleges is illegal. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Before joining the Court, Justice Kavanaugh had voiceddoubts about the soundness of the Watergate precedents, specifically, the Court’s unanimous United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
In other words, must they cross state lines, be directly involved in the process, carry goods rather than passengers or be in the actual stream of interstate rather than local commerce? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:24 pm
Eligible Costs Subject to certain limitations, borrowers are eligible for forgiveness in an amount equal to the sum of the following costs incurred or paid (as described below) during the 8-week or 24-week covered period (as defined in Section 1106): Payroll costs including salary, wages and tips, up to $100,000 of annualized pay per employee (for 24 weeks, a maximum of $46,154 per individual, or for 8 weeks, a maximum of $15,385 per individual), as well as covered benefits for employees (but not… [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am
The destination state may, for example, have an ‘adequacy decision’ that means that the state in question ensures an adequate (roughly equivalent) level of protection to the ensured by the GDPR (Article 45 GDPR). [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
The Court’s judgment, in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland and Maximillian Schrems (“Schrems II”), holds that the Privacy Shield does not take adequate account of U.S. laws authorizing public authorities to access data transferred from the EU to the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:47 am
This was worded broadly enough to encompass the situation at issue. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
Jones v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:09 am
In Tidwell v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:05 pm
State, 781 A.2d 913 (Md. 2001), so maybe it's time for me to write another one. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:13 pm
Along with the rise of legal positivism, international law became perceived as the body of law dealing with external aspects of States or, in other words, with relationships between States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 4:20 pm
The Committee also does not discuss recent precedent, such as NIFLA v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
” Haggin v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:53 pm
United States and Trumbo v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am
Now, probably more than ever, a particular focus should be put on the data exporter’s evaluation of the legal developments in the recipient state. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:14 am
Case citation: United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Lastly, I will close with a few words about how the Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:22 am
The Greek Supreme will have the final word. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:30 pm
Esbeck, University of Missouri School of Law, has posted The Establishment Clause: What the Text and Record in the First Federal Congress Can Tell Us About Original Meaning:Modern times in church-state relations began in 1947 with the Supreme Court’s decision in Everson v. [read post]
