Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7821 - 7840
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
After all, doesn’t BAHA’s § 1(e) define “workers in the United States” and “United States workers” as described in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
”[18] These legal processes, e.g. a right to a jury trial, are often not available in administrative proceedings.[19] Statutory Removal of ALJs Finally, the Court found a third “constitutional infirmity,” with the SEC administrative proceedings relating to the layers of for-cause protection preventing the removal of ALJs by the President of the United States and thus impeding the Executive branch’s control over the ALJs as guaranteed by Article II of the… [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:26 am
After all, doesn’t BAHA’s § 1(e) define “workers in the United States” and “United States workers” as described in 8 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am
United States, 14-10154, was the lone grant among the relists. [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:05 pm
Garrett and Gangopadhyaya suggest that uninsurance rates will be uneven across the United States based on whether states chose to expand Medicaid coverage to offer insurance to a larger pool of consumers. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 1:06 pm
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Wyeth v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
Living Trust, a 12-page opinion, Judge Bailey writes:Appellant-Petitioner Pamela S. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
And the biggest hurdle was that the Federal court couldn’t simply come to a different legal determination than the state court had; the state court decision had to be accepted unless it “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:55 am
United States (1967). [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 11:56 am
Section 337(a) has been held to impliedly preempt private claims based on its language that “all proceedings for the enforcement or to restrain violations of the FDCA ‘shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
For starters, the court has relisted a case sufficiently famous that it can be widely identified by just the petitioner’s name, Arlene’s Flowers. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:09 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Jennifer L.D., the Court of Appeals recognized each petitioner=s status as a parent but did so applying two completely different tests. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Jennifer L.D., the Court of Appeals recognized each petitioner=s status as a parent but did so applying two completely different tests. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
Qualcomm case--where the Federal Circuit held that Apple lacked standing to appeal decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) due to a portfolio license it had taken from Qualcomm in 2019--we at least know what the Department of Justice (DOJ) thought. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 10:50 am
As stated above, this mindset is both helpful and harmful. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am
Davis, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Petitioner): John M. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
Tesoro also proposed to shut down its Wilmington Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit, a major source of air pollution at the facility. [read post]
