Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 7821 - 7840 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Dec 2010, 9:19 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Lopez (1995) 514 U.S. 549) , and 2) a Federal civil lawsuit for nonconsensual sexual contact (United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:47 pm by Ilya Somin
In my view, a far better answer to the government’s argument is that the mandate isn’t “proper” even if it is “necessary” and that it runs afoul of the five part test recently outlined by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/08-10436.pdf United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 11:38 am by Mark S. Humphreys
" As stated in the 1982 Houston Court of Appeals [14th Dist] case, Parchman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:27 am
"Specification 2 alleged that "on two separate occasions between January 1998 and December 1999," Wolfe "stopped two individuals and confiscated, for personal monetary gain, a quantity of United States currency. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 302 AD2d 155, 163-164 [1st Dept 2002]; Buran v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:01 pm
Their question concerns the standard of proof required by section 282 of 35 USC (the Patent Act section of the United States Code) which states that: "[a] patent shall be presumed valid" and that "[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim thereof shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 11:37 am by Jim Singer
The United States Supreme Court has accepted for review a new patent case that will determine what burden of proof is required to challenging a patent’s validity in court. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 9:33 am by cornellvermontlaw
The Pentagon Papers were, for those who need a refresher, a top-secret study of the United States involvement in Vietnam during the years 1945-1967. [read post]