Search for: "California Law Review"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 29,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The Orange County District Attorney's office filed a petition for review, and on June 16, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued this order: The petition for review is granted. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 12:07 am
The court restated the black letter law that an association's regulations which are inconsistent with a declaration are invalid.Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:25 am
Almost none of the amendments that were designed to make the law more appropriate to the realities of doing business in California in the 21st Century were passed. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 9:22 pm
Karlan (Stanford Law School) has posted Marriage, Method, and the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
We're posting a series of reviews, as well as author responses, and we hope you'll join our discussion in the comments. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 4:36 am
We've seen similar stories about alleged law suit mills in the context of the ADA, California's unfair business practices act, and California's toxic substances law.) [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
Disclosure laws and professional regulations usually are reviewed by whether they are rational, not instead, as the majority insisted, subjecting them to the strictest scrutiny. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
In doing so, the husband was required to waive a dollar-for-dollar portion of the pension under federal law. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 5:06 pm
” In addition, Forensic Anthropologist, Madeline Hinkes (also from California) reviewed three separate CAT scans and all other medical evidence and concluded that there was no skull fracture on this child as the State’s Medical Examiner had maintained. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 4:30 am
Young (The George Washington University Law School) & Hannah Chimowitz (University of Massachusetts Amherst - Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences) have posted Remorse, Relational Legal Consciousness, and the Reproduction of Carceral Logic (Law & Society Review 56( 2): 237– 260, 2022) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Law and Empire Pär Kristoffer Cassel, Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Li Chen, Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes: Sovereignty, Justice, and Transcultural Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2015).Jenny Huangfu Day, “The Enigma of a Taiping Fugitive: The Illusion of Justice and the ‘Political Offence Exception’ in Extradition from Hong… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:15 am
Hypertouch brought claims under California law (California Business and Professions Code § 17529.5(a)) but did not meet the heightened pleading standard of Rule 9. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:35 am
He is the author of seven books and over 100 law review articles. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:00 pm
Works to prevent lawsuits by establishing a binding independent review system to resolve medical disputes. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:45 pm
California v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:20 pm
” Although initially upheld on appeal, Ameron sought review before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:26 pm
More Blog Posts: California Appellate Court Reverses Dismissal of Injury Lawsuit Because Plaintiff’s Failure to Cooperate with Discovery Was Not Shown to be Willful, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog, May 19, 2016 California Supreme Court Reviews Statute of Limitations in Medical Malpractice Case, Southern California Injury Lawyer Blog, May 16, 2016 [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:42 am
The court rejected Kwan’s invocation of Lanham Act establishment claim precedent because doing so “would clearly violate recognized California law on the burden of proof placed on the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:32 pm
This decision establishes a clear split in authority between California’s First and Fourth Appellate Districts, potentially making the issue ripe for the California Supreme Court to weigh in. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 2:26 pm
The US Supreme Court [SCOTUS] has declined to review whether the PREP Act [The Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act of 2005, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
