Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 7841 - 7860 of 12,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
(c) Amend New Hire Letter: All things considered, I think this is the way to go for many employers. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Section 10(b) and the corresponding Rule 10b-5 more broadly prohibit the making of any untrue statement or omission of a material fact in connection with the purchase or sale of securities with the intent to defraud or deceive. [6] Thus, Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 cover a broader range of statements than the Section 11 and 12(a)(2) claims discussed above, as they are not limited to statements in registration statements and prospectuses. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  An MA Plan offers the same coverages found under Parts A and B, but has the added benefit of a prescription drug plan and additional coverage options provided through a private insurance company. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 1:45 pm by Erika C. Collins and Ryan H. Hutzler
  It is essential, therefore, that employers always:  (a) have a legitimate justification to ask such questions; (b) communicate to individuals that none of the answers will be used for decisional purposes; and (c) inform individuals that they have the right not to answer (and/or provide individuals with the option to select “other”). [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
S 1988(b); e. an award for reasonable and customary costs, expenses, and interest incurred in pursuit of this action; and f. whatever additional relief the Court may deem proper. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 1:07 am by Andrew Trask
Code § 78u–4(c)); and it tied attorneys’ fees to relied actually obtained for class members. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 7:56 am by Stefanie Levine
Chien then suggests some strategies for defending against trolls and removing the defense-side barriers: a) alternative fees; b) shared defensive efforts; and c) creating non-profit trolls. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 9:33 am by WSLL
Noble.Date of Decision: January 18, 2012Facts:  Appellant, acting as President of his construction company, entered into an oral agreement to lease his business and all associated equipment and land to the appellees. [read post]