Search for: "Does 1-10" Results 7841 - 7860 of 41,679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2021, 10:17 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
DOE has launched a portal to track state usage of the $31 billion CARES Act Education Stabilization Fund.) [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 9:09 am by Rachel Moroski and Brooke Purcell
  The ordinance will only apply to corporations that are publicly traded or have at least 300 employees nationwide and more than 10 employees per store site. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 8:04 am by Sasha Volokh
But let me put that aside, and note a few things. 1. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
After all, ICC does have a special relationship with this particular strategic partner. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 2:47 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court held “that a disgorgement award that does not exceed a wrongdoer’s net profits and is awarded for victims is equitable relief permissible” in civil actions brought by the SEC. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
Moreover, the statutory search condition applicable to post-release supervisees, G.S. 15A-1368.4(e)(10), allows searches only of the supervisee’s person, not of his or her premises. [read post]
And if a former employee was laid off or terminated without cause, does their non-compete remain enforceable? [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 6:38 am by Berry Law Firm
We’re contacted by a Veteran who is rated at, say, 10 or 30% for PTSD. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 3:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
The end consumer does not, making it a tax on final consumption. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm by vforberger
And, here are my comments: Here is a classic example of how the claim-filing process is broken.1- The questions here go from specific and less familiar to the more general and more easily known. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 1:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
”   The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and seeks to recover damages on behalf of the plaintiff class. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 7:52 am by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
It does not apply where the cited patent/application at issue would not otherwise qualify as prior art, such as where the subject application has the same or an earlier effective filing date, or where the patents/applications have the same inventorship. [read post]