Search for: "JAMES V. STATE"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 10,691
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Eleventh Circuit wasted little time in applying AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:42 am
Rept. 100-576, at 921 (1988). [7] United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 7:57 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” ** Although it could be argued that the use of the word “State” limits the negotiation of alternative disciplinary procedures to the State and employee organizations representing State workers, in practice alternatives to statutory disciplinary procedures have been negotiated by political subdivisions of the State and employee organizations representing employees of such political subdivisions for decades. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
"In Krishnan Murgai AIR 1980 SC 1717, the Supreme Court went further and stated that even if a provision in the Act is based on English Law on a particular aspect, the extent and scope of the provision must be governed by the statute itself and not by the English doctrine. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:19 pm
S3G stated that Dr. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court's 2004 ruling in Banks v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:28 pm
In considering Morley’s application for relief the Court stated: Although we have found that he acted honestly, it does not appear to us that he ought fairly to be excused, or that he should be relieved from liability for the contravention. [read post]
6 May 2011, 12:24 pm
Top court sides with trial lawyer in separate cases decided on same day – by Danielle Ulman Workdays don’t get much better than the one criminal lawyer Andrew V. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:08 am
Ct. 1979); O’Reilly v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 4:15 am
In Rasmussen v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:51 am
Jackson in Watts v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:52 am
http://tinyurl.com/2e82fnb (Orange Legal Technologies) HP Exec Spills Huge Company Secret On LinkedIn Profile - http://tinyurl.com/3dcrndv (Matt Rosoff) ILTA London Reviewed - http://tinyurl.com/3vdztue (Joanna Goodman) IT Pros Cross-Examine Digital Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/3npm69z (Kim Davis) It's Time Users Demand Better Data Handling - http://tinyurl.com/3hflkfv (Scott Koegler) Lifecycle Management: Fixed v Dynamic Content - http://tinyurl.com/3pnj44s (James Watson)… [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:42 pm
Such absolute rules were not rare (James v UK App No 8793/79 para 47). [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am
Kuker and James M. [read post]
3 May 2011, 6:45 am
Concepcion (which James covered yesterday). [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:44 pm
By James M. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:26 pm
Gaitis Last week’s United States Supreme Court decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 11:26 am
Lewis, Jr. v. [read post]
