Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 7,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
But button-wearing spectators do not clearly pose an unacceptable risk because (1) most courts have upheld convictions despite the presence of button wearers, and (2) victims may have a First Amendment right to wear "mourners' buttons" that would justify some level of risk to the defendant's rights. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 1:10 pm
Charges filed by Teamsters Local 604; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1), (2), and (3). [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
John D. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 4:46 pm
3. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 11:23 am
” In general, however, a PI should only issue after weighing "(1) the likelihood of the patentee’s success on the merits; (2) irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; (3) the balance of hardships between the parties; and (4) the public interest. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 4:25 am
Does anyone honestly believe that Ms. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Currently the EITC does not provide any additional help for families with more than two children. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 11:26 am
They also reviewed 2 PS3 games, giving them both 1 star, and the Nintendo Game Cube, giving it 1 star as well. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
Another peeve I have are internal conferences — Sally met with Joe 1/2 hour, Joe met with Bill 1/2 hour, Bill met with Sally 1/2 hour. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 12:33 pm
In case you're interested, the structure is designed to workshop papers that are just more than raw, but only about 1/3 to 1/2 baked. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
He noted that the CBE must give up its statutory rights to: (1) speak freely against the Union campaign; (2) have a Board-conducted election to determine the representational desires of its employees; and (3) to determine what contractual provisions it will agree to, i.e., the CBE will proceed to interest arbitration if it does not agree to the Union's contractual demands. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 12:25 pm
Based on this decision, a claimant can use a property for 3 months on weekends, adjoining 2 continuous months and then be entirely undetectable for the other seven continuous months and still meet the requirement of continuous use. [read post]
11 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
Brailsford, 3 U.S. 1 (1794), in which John Jay, for a unanimous Supreme Court, wrote:"It may not be amiss, here, Gentlemen, to remind you of the good old rule, that on questions of fact, it is the province of the jury, on questions of law, it is the province of the court to decide. [read post]
10 Nov 2006, 10:44 pm
2. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 9:10 pm
Here’s two things you need to know about software patent lawsuits: 1) they only exist when the defendant has money, and 2) software patents and open source are not incompatible just because RedHat (or anyone else) says that they are. [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 10:02 pm
As I pointed out earlier, as of the 2006 edition of The Education Gap, by William Howell and Paul Peterson, every publicly-funded voucher program in the country was aimed at 1) students from low-income families, or 2) students who attend "failing" public schools [note that not many of these students are likely to be in rich, white suburbs], or 3) students who have no public school in their community. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:47 am
At this point, it's too early to tell if the Act (1) will correct the abuses it was intended to correct, (2) will impose unreasonable (as opposed to simply "increased") costs and other burdens on debtors, and (3) will create unexpected problems for creditors or debtors. [read post]
19 Oct 2006, 6:24 am
For what it's worth, although John gets the big picture of the MCA right, there are several inaccurate statements in John's Op/Ed, including these: 1. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Charges filed by Electrical Workers IBEW Local 2; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 8:38 am
The level and approbationary nature of the email response to the post on Moral Meltdown indicated, as poll after poll also does implicitly or explicitly, that there is great dissatisfaction with the way things have gone and are going in this country. [read post]
