Search for: "Johns v State" Results 7841 - 7860 of 22,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2011, 6:52 am by Kali Borkoski
”   James Mets – The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Florence v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Rick Hasen
Across the United States, attorneys (“johns,” as the analogy goes) are giving campaign money to judges (“prostitutes”) and then asking those judges for legal favors in the form of rulings for themselves and their clients. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:56 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 June 2015. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 10:06 am
Supreme Court has issued an order dismissing certiorari as improvidently granted in Philip Morris v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am by Christine Corcos
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:30 am by azatty
The band is well known in legal circles due to their battle with the United States Trademark Office with In Re Tam, which is now before the Supreme Court of the United States and known as Lee v. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Butler, John Edward Fowler Distinguished Professor of Law and International Affairs, Pennsylvania State UniversityEDITORIAL BOARDJean Allain, Queen's University, Belfast Olga V. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:02 am by WSLL
Phillips, Attorney General; John D. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]