Search for: "MATTER OF C A"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 36,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
The case will also consider whether, in circumstances where the Respondents are a group of companies to which the appellants provided services in exchange for remuneration, each Respondent entity is to be treated as an ‘employer’ for the jurisdictional purposes of the Convention, or if the claims of other companies in the group are to be treated as matters ‘relating to individual contracts of employment’. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
Slip Op. 02407 (3d Dept., 2019), following a nonjury trial Supreme Court granted the wife a judgment of divorce and concluded that the husband was solely responsible for a student loan C then roughly $ 224,000 C related to the college education of the middle child. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 7:22 am
Be that as it may, limited to the constellation in question, AG Szpunar concluded: “Point (l) of Article 1(2), point (l) of Article 68 and Article 69(5) of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession preclude the application of… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:16 am
Whereas only if this question were to be characterised as a matter of substance, the question of substitution could at all be posed. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
In Case C-49/12, Sunico, the ECJ held that the concept of “civil and commercial matters” within the meaning of Article 1 of Regulation Brussels I covers an action whereby a public authority of one Member State claims, as against persons resident in another Member State, damages for loss caused by a tortious conspiracy to commit value added tax fraud in the first Member State. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
C. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:31 pm
Heister, in which that court held that a UIM rejection form identical to the one at issue in this matter did specifically comply with § 1731(c). [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 12:39 pm
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:38 am
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:04 am
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:04 pm
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:37 am
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
1 May 2007, 12:40 pm
`(i) The term `claimed invention' means the subject matter defined by a claim in a patent or an application for a patent. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
IF you need assistance with a legal matter call 1 888 752-7474. [read post]
3 May 2007, 2:48 pm
The ‘Advocaten voor de Wereld' contended that the removal of verification of double criminality for certain offences listed in the Framework Decision was contrary to the principle of legality in criminal matters. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:48 pm
As a reminder, the following italicized questions come from Jane C. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
They did this through the infamous Omnibus Bills, especially C-38[1] in 2012. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
Associates Violated Theft Statute by Taking Client Files to Jump-Start Their New Practice By Joan C. [read post]
