Search for: "MRS v. State"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 21,763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Overstreet v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
In 2012, the United States Supreme Court held in Miller v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:30 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 7:25 am
Mr. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:19 am
In the High Court, Mr Justice Mann found in favour of the claimants. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:10 pm
Carter-Ruck acted for both Mr Theedom and Impresa. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 10:08 am
Mr. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:34 am
Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:18 pm
Indeed, she would have completely missed the recent unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute (see previous posts here) had it not been gratefully brought to her attention by an eagle eyed reader. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 4:52 am
The clause, properly interpreted, stands for the proposition that had Mr. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am
Mr Samin challenged this decision. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm
Mr. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 1:17 pm
For Mr. [read post]
Appellate Court Affirms Exclusion of Plaintiff’s Medical Expert Testimony Based on Lack of Certainty
26 Jan 2016, 9:31 am
Cleveland v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am
As Laing J observed in Merlin v Cave [2014] EWHC 3036 (QB): “There is no express indication in the PHA that Parliament intended the provisions of the PHA to abrogate the rights conferred by Article 10, or to change the law of defamation, which is, by necessary implication, involved in any consideration of the scope of the legitimate restrictions which may be placed by a contracting state on the rights conferred by Article 10. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
Also of note, as highlighted by Mr Shahid’s lawyers, is the court’s use of international reports, underlining that such documents may very well be referred to when assessing the state’s actions. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 12:50 am
Mr A M Mohamud (in substitution for Mr A Mohamud (deceased)) v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc and Cox v Ministry of Justice, heard 12-13 October 2015. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
