Search for: "People v. New" Results 7841 - 7860 of 41,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo signed into law as Chapter 374 of the Laws of 2018 a bill permitting the "people" of New York State to pursue state charges against individuals who were "accused of federal crimes and receive a presidential pardon. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm by Unknown
Blog posts & press:Bureaucratic Gaps and Exclusion: The Limits of Documentary ‘Protection’ for Rohingyas in India (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]Coronavirus Reaches the World’s Most Persecuted People: The Threat of COVID-19 in the Rohingya Refugee Camps (Refugee Research Online, Nov. 2020) [text]Human Rights Metaphors: Revealing Regional Perspectives about Rohingya Displacement since the Andaman Sea Crisis (Kaldor Centre, Dec. 2020) [text]"Rohingya Refugees… [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
And in further en banc news, the Sixth Circuit will reconsider its decision that a Kentucky prosecutor's striking four African-American veniremen did not violate Batson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:32 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is one of those celebrity cases that only arise in the Second Circuit, home of New York City, where famous people live and work and play and bring lawsuits against other famous people.The case is Oakley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 6:18 am by Richard Hunt
It does not run freely around an aircraft or an airport gate area, bark or growl repeatedly at other persons or other animals on the aircraft or in the airport gate area, bite, jump on, or cause injury to people, or urinate or defecate in the cabin or gate area. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
In a ruling late in the night, the day before Thanksgiving, the Supreme Court issued a preliminary injunction against Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York, preventing him from imposing restrictions on how many people could attend houses of worship—restrictions that Governor Cuomo defended as necessary to fight the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
Most people know overtly sexual comments are likely to violate their employer’s rules and could lead to sexual harassment claims. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm by Jason Kelley
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12]… [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:50 pm by Amy Howe
Therefore, he argued, the decision in Ramos was not a “new rule” for purposes of the Supreme Court’s 1989 decision in Teague v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:00 am by Alexis
Did the ruling in the Miranda case grant any new rights to people who are arrested? [read post]