Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 7841 - 7860 of 19,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm by Stephen Gillers
§1881a, by the FISA Amendments Act (FAA) of 2008 to create new procedures for authorizing electronic surveillance against non-U.S. individuals outside the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 9:39 am by Vandenack Weaver LLC
Move Press had registered this trademark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and its use of the mark clearly preceded the use by Peloton. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:14 am
This was a United States District Court Case filed in the Fort Worth Division of North Texas. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:07 pm
The reason it's fiction is that there never has been one case in the entire United States of minors buying wine online in order to get "crunk," as the kids say. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 11:34 am
About a year ago, the United States Supreme Court held in Padilla v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am by David Kopel
In 1998, the Supreme Court issued its most important modern decision on the Excessive Fines Clause, United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 6:41 am by Mark S. Humphreys
A Western District, San Antonio Division opinion styled, Erika Sanchez v. [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 4:17 am by David Super
“No officer or employee of the United States may defer any budget authority for any other purpose. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 7:22 am
United States and Dean v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
Since 2012, she has headed the Post Conviction Unit and she reviews claims of actual innocence. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:38 am by WIMS
<> United Fire & Casualty Company  v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:46 am by Matt Van Steenkiste
  This left people with the option to set up residency in other states in order to qualify to file for divorce jurisdictionally, which takes 60-90 days and an intent to reside there indefinitely.Fortunately for these couples, the recent United States Supreme Court ruling Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 6:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Chief Justice John Marshall famously stated "[t]he government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. [read post]