Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7841 - 7860 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2012, 2:10 pm by Sam Murrant
BBC News offers short commentary on the decision here. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
The executive summaries of Volumes I and II are short, clear, and illuminating. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:55 am by Colby Pastre
For a single filer at every level of taxable income above $70,500, South Carolina features either the highest or second-highest income tax burden in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 7:10 am by jn92
In this case, the source is a set of books published by the United States government that contains the opinions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:47 pm
  Six years later, of course, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am by Lisa McElroy
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 11:22 pm by INFORRM
United States The New York Post has settled a libel claim brought by two individuals who were pictured on the front page with headline the headline “Bag Men: Feds seek duo pictured at Boston Marathon. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:30 am
As per the conceptual comparison, the Court endorsed the Board of Appeal’s findings that the word ‘elma’ is an unusual female first name and is also the name of four small towns in the United States [which, for what it’s worth, a Greek consumer would have never thought], and that the word ‘elmex’ is devoid of any meaning. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 10:49 am by Karen Gullo
As the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) has stated, “the obligation to indiscriminately retain data exceeds the limits of what can be considered necessary and proportionate. [read post]