Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
Had he been on the court, I suspect there would be a lot of changes that I don’t like and the American people wouldn’t like, including everything from Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Jones Day v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Professor Madison, however, suspects an intentional end-run around reverse engineering fair use law by intentionally asserting only state-law contract claims, copying the proceedings in Bowers v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 5:22 am
Arguably the most important decision from a technology perspective—and the case that was of most interest to me personally—was LG v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WIPO General Assembly opens: New Director-General delivers acceptance speech (IPRoo) (IAM) (WIPO) (WIPO) (WIPO) (IPKat) (WIPO) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Managing Intellectual Property) (WIPO) (IP Menu News) CAFC: 'Point of novelty' design test thrown out; the value of amicus briefs: Egyptian Goddess, Inc… [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:53 pm
In April, Judge Neil V. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:01 pm
The district court held patent exhaustion was not an independent cause of action but instead a defense to an infringement claim, and dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction so any state law claims could be pursued in state court.The Federal Circuit affirmed, observing the case met neither of the criteria for § 1338(a) jurisdiction under the Supreme Court's decision in Christianson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:36 pm
The plaintiff brought a declaratory judgment action against the defendant patent holder in Washington. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 4:15 pm
Finally, Pheil claimed that the amendment impaired the security of the mortgage holders, and thus required a stated level of approval by the holders of debt. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:06 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jermaine Young v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
Respondents relied on Rust v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 12:46 am
See, e.g., Hopson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 11:38 am
Richlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 7:06 pm
Patrick v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 4:23 pm
It is for Member States' courts to determine whether orders are not 'ordinary', i.e. if they are out of proportion to the needs of that Member State's market. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
The very first case which squarely addressed the issue of whether or not the RIAA's "making available" theory stated a claim for relief under the Copyright Act was a Connecticut case, Atlantic v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
WebFeats, and in 2004, in Lucas Nursery v Grosse, that the use of a trademark in a domain name for a web site that comments on the trademark holder is not actionable. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Scott v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont sign up… [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:12 am
First, Section 602(a) of Title 17 of the United States Code states that importation of copyrighted works obtained outside the United States without the authorization of the US copyright holder is infringement under section 106. [read post]
