Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 45,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2018, 11:14 am
(See Arizona v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:13 am
[Post by Venkat] Kleffman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
The decision effectively extended to juvenile LWOP the long-standing rule for capital cases for adults. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:11 am
That choice is not a constitutional problem so long as it is clear and not coercive. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:50 am
California and in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:31 pm
Roberts might struggle to balance the long-term prestige of the Court against his conservative ideology, but on abortion, do not expect him to save Roe. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:09 pm
[Post by Venkat] Abbas v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:40 am
State v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:59 am
Although the formulation of what is required to properly reserve jurisdiction is stated a little differently in different parts of the appellate opinion, the opinion concludes with indicating that the trial court was required to have made a determination in 1990 regarding the Wife's need for and entitlement to alimony, or to at least have awarded "nominal" alimony (e.g. $1 per month), and also to have set out some appropriate duration for how long it was reserving… [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry said in Capato v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:18 am
The Supreme Court’s Analysis Tracing the history of patent law in the United States, the Court noted that it had previously considered the standard of proof in its decision in Radio Corp. of America v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:48 pm
And Smith set off a long chain of events: The passage of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and its state equivalents. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 1:55 pm
While "[t]he states have long protected the important reputational interests of its citizens in following the strict liability common law of defamation[,]"neither Dr. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:18 pm
USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 270–71 (1994) (collecting cases); see also United States v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
” Saxe, 240 F.3d at 204; see also United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:24 am
In Parker v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:50 am
Joe Mullin, an IP Law & Business reporter, has an excellent series of posts on his The Prior Art blog discussing the Harris v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 4:06 pm
While this has not been utilized by agents of the state to the best of our knowledge, it would seem that such a use of technology by police officials would ultimately fall under the same rules, at least as long as users intend data to remain private. [read post]
