Search for: "State v. Still" Results 7841 - 7860 of 44,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 10:45 am by Michelle O'Neil
Section 2 of DOMA says that states do not have to recognize same sex marriages from other states, and that section still stands today. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 5:45 pm by Charles Rubin
This was a factual analysis, but the Court borrowed from other cases (including Goosen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 9:22 am by Lyle Denniston
Although there is as yet no sign of active defiance by officials in states where such marriages remained banned — that is, as of June 26, when the Court decided Obergefell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 6:07 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Moreover, in Pioneer Aggregates (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [1985] AC 132 the House of Lords held that there is no room for any principle of abandonment in planning law. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:22 pm
” Distinguishing the 1996 case of Medtronic v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:46 am by Sheppard Mullin
 This was the first published state court decision in California regarding employment arbitration agreements since the United States Supreme Court's groundbreaking decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 10:14 am by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani, with comments from Eric] WEC Carolina Energy Solutions LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
   However, Sehgal v DiRaimondo 2018 NY Slip Op 06619 [165 AD3d 435] October 4, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department. shows that there can be interesting variations in which claims might still exist. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
19 May 2010, 7:11 am by Anna Christensen
Florida and United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 5:53 pm
Interesting application of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
The Cambridge law did not involve forcible vaccination, but Holmes still used the case to uphold a compulsory sterilization regime. [read post]