Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 14,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 1:59 pm
Website owners and web scrapers will want to watch hi’Q Labs’ litigation against LinkedIn Corp. to see if these two characteristics are, in fact, compatible, something placed in doubt by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in HiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:54 pm
AndreOn May 17, 2010, in Simpson Strong Tie Co., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The recent case is State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 8:05 pm
Christopher V. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 10:33 am
In a recent case, Cerrato-Molina v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
However, comparing the marks in their entireties, "the addition of the term 'Ice Age' to applicant's mark serves to distinguish the marks because consumers are likely to regard “Lip Service” as used in applicant’s mark as indicating the function of applicant’s lip preparation, and to look to the other elements in the mark to indicate the source of applicant’s product.As the CCPA stated in Sure-Fit Products Company v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:36 pm
Conahan’s issuance of an injunction for an alleged corrupt motive is identical to the conduct the Supreme Court considered when granting immunity in Dennis v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 10:46 am
This was the so-called 'wager of the strong'. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:48 am
In Ngyuen v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:36 am
See Nava v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:45 am
Based on that fact, the court rejected AMN’s attempt to analogize to Loral Corp. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
They quoted Sibron v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm
I regret to state that I did not believe him. [read post]
16 Jan 2025, 11:11 am
United States, Shah v. [read post]
18 Feb 2025, 7:01 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 10:13 am
In Summum v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am
In particular, local agencies should not be subject to the same strict non-delegation doctrine by which state agencies are arguably constrained under Boreali v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:23 am
And: As part of Ringo v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 3:24 am
Mandoka, Chairman Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Dennis V. [read post]
