Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 7841 - 7860 of 9,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 5:52 am by Ivan Horodyskyy
Not all requests from the Ministry of Justice have been granted, reflecting the adversarial nature of the process and the due process standards that require prosecutors to meet their burden of proof. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Here is Professor Engstrom’s guest post:   **************************** The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
Damages can be granted by the Strasbourg court, but fall below the level of damages available in domestic cases. [read post]
20 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Later, we learned that those staff members had also used search terms like “occupy” that would tend to target left-leaning groups. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 10:46 am by Joel R. Brandes
Defendant argued that block billing was improper and that "task billing," which listed the time for each separate task and is an enhanced level of billing, should have been used. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Using such terms to refer to one's commercial choices does not create a First Amendment right to contract, or not to contract. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions programs used by Harvard College and University of North Carolina (UNC) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, effectively striking down the use of affirmative action programs for college and university admissions across the country (Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
While, the LSSO Report provides useful information, it cannot be seen as being representative. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 4:36 am by Russell Knight
Joint parental decision-making used to be referred to as “joint custody” in Illinois. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by Bexis
Minn. 2009) (discussed here), or we can take advantage of a really dumb decision by the other side, see Maestas v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:52 am
[v]Another element that may cause some misunderstanding of the priorities in a layoff -- the individual may have been appointed to what has been designated a “permanent position” or appointed to position designated a “temporary position. [read post]