Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7841 - 7860 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:13 am by Lyle Denniston
Colorado (2000) 12-1371 — United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:34 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
Class action litigation over food product labels is rapidly emerging around the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
” On this basis, the court concluded that the claimant’s alleged loss would have occurred in the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm by William Baude
On the other hand, the Supreme Court’s decision in Calder v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 10:06 pm by Jon Gelman
Since then, narcotic painkillers, or opioids, have become the most frequently prescribed drugs in the United States and have set off a wave of misuse, abuse and addiction. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 9:16 pm by Walter Olson
And, of course, some states, like California and Virginia, maintain SYG only judicially, without having passed any legislation. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
United States – which he describes as a “rare criminal case where the defendant is right” – and Sprint Communications v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 150358 (ED CA, Oct. 18, 2013), a California federal magistrate judge allowed an Orthodox Jewish inmate to proceed with his complaint that it took 147 days before he was furnished with kosher meals.In Phillips v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 4:33 am by Florian Mueller
And I would be – I mean, I would be surprised if, in their obligations in the United States they haven't made that disclosure.There's definitely some pressure on Samsung down under and it has to answer some questions now. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 2:38 pm by Steven G. Pearl
  The Supreme Court of the United States granted review and vacated that decision, remanding the case for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion 563 U.S. ___ (2011) (discussed here). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:56 pm
HeaddingCase number: 10-cv-00241 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: March 1, 2010Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 4, 2013 10/22/2013 01/20/2014 2013-85 In the Matter of Deerfield Management Company, L.P.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]