Search for: "United States v. Little"
Results 7841 - 7860
of 10,420
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2010, 5:08 am
The requirement to investigate does not depend on a complaint from the victim or next-of-kin: once the matter has come to the attention of the authorities they must act of their own motion (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 1:22 pm
It recalled the extensive commentary by Justice Kennedy, in the Court’s last same-sex marriage decision (United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:56 am
The United States filed an amicus brief in support of Kurns and Corson. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 3:40 am
From Meshwerks, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
What is happening to the Peer-to-Patent project in the United States? [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
Calling the motion "wholly without merit, both factually and legally," the judge, Denny Chin of United States District Court threw out the case. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:25 pm
The argument was mentioned in Fayed v United Kingdom ((1994) 18 EHRR 393) and it was accepted in Rotaru v Romania ((2000) 8 BHRC 449 [44]). [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
The term fair use originated in the United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
The (relatively) recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Boston Scientific Medizintechnik GmbH v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:40 pm
United States, in 1935. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 11:26 am
Like the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit assumed arguendo that such a right existed, recognizing that “[t]he Supreme Court of the United States has explicitly declined to decide whether there is a constitutional privacy interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 9:01 pm
”Some 35 years later, in Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Activ8-3D (EPLAW) EWPCC deals with unregistered designs: Access plus inspiration need not mean copying: Albert Packaging v Nampak (Class 99) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform Patent Reform Update: Will the House pass America Invents Act? [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Technogenia v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:06 am
” (See Prosecutor v Karadzić (Decision) 16 May 1995 (ICTY Trial Chamber) paras 23-24.) [read post]
28 Jan 2025, 9:22 am
Thus, in Bradbury v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 10:00 am
(Creative Commons) Copyright Office hearing on proposed exemptions to DMCA ban on DRM circumvention (EFF) (Ars Technica) Open educational resources and implementation of the US Recovery Act (Creative Commons) Twitter and the DMCA: A fine mess (The Trademark Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – Apple sued by BluWiki operator OdioWorks, seeking declaratory judgment that its postings do not violate DMCA (Ars Technica) (EFF) Google – District… [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Richardson and Califano v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 6:56 am
Many of the default judgment cases we read include an injunction that could never be enforced by contempt, and if federal courts were a little more careful about granting meaningful relief based on the pleadings the kind of result found in Kennedy v. [read post]
