Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 7861 - 7880 of 15,815
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2014, 2:45 pm by Gene Quinn
On Monday, March 31, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held oral arguments in the much-anticipated software battle between patentee Alice Corporation, the petitioner, and CLS Bank, the respondent who was victorious below thanks to an equally divided Federal Circuit. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by Joy Waltemath
At trial on the employee’s sexual harassment and retaliation claims under Title VII and state law, the parties disputed the extent and nature of the harassment, whether the president or others retaliated against the employee, and whether the bank’s reasons for firing her were pretextual. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
CLS Bank International, in which the Court is considering whether the Patent Act authorizes patents on computer software. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
She also gave the Council her January 2012 bank statement. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
She also gave the Council her January 2012 bank statement. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Early post-Buckley decisions, most notably the forerunner to Citizens United, First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
”  Further, he argued that the employee had no ability to waive the states claim comparing it to the case of EEOC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Expedia Inc., 2014 ONSC 2073 http://t.co/AG81lXcEJB -> BEWARE – Why You Need to Know About Canada's New Anti-Spam Legislation http://t.co/vCipGEmgsQ v -> EU Member state court has jurisdiction to try copyright case where damage occurs Hi Hotel HCF [2014] EUECJ C-387/12 http://t.co/ul8Qn7XH9F -> Can Comics Copyright Comedy? [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm by Florian Mueller
I recommend to the people I know in the Apple fan community who would like to see draconian remedies imposed on Samsung for Apple's competitive gain beyond what is warranted by its inventive contributions to the state of the art (I just borrowed language from a Federal Circuit ruling recently quoted by Judge Koh in Apple v. [read post]