Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 7861 - 7880 of 12,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 7:56 am by Stefanie Levine
Chien then suggests some strategies for defending against trolls and removing the defense-side barriers: a) alternative fees; b) shared defensive efforts; and c) creating non-profit trolls. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:20 am
The patent, which expires in August 2011, covers the ratio between the two components.Of the legal aspect of the case-->The majority and dissent disagreed on the outcome as to claims 43-48, 51, 54, 67, 69, 72, and 74.Does (A + B +C +D) render (A + B) obvious? [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 1:16 pm by Robert B. Milligan
It’s ridiculous we let companies hide behind these agreements as a means to depress wages and stave off competition. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:16 am by Robert D. Forbes
”  Second, the hyperlink must direct users to a mechanism by which users may prevent ScanScout from (a) collecting data that can be associated with a particular user; (b) redirecting users’ browsers to third parties that collect data (absent a click or other affirmative action by the user); and (c) associating any previously collected data with the user. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:26 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 12:02 pm by Annette Burns
The Schickner case, also filed April 2015, didn’t add a tremendous amount of new law on the issue of minority discounts, but it did establish that (a) ProFinish, a shareholders’ rights case, doesn’t apply in family court; (b) no Arizona case prevents a court from applying a minority discount in a family court business valuation; (c) there still is no bright-line rule in Arizona for applying a minority discount; but (d) the minority discount was not approved where… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:42 am by Ailyn Cabico
  The final rules require these exempt reporting advisers to submit an annual report with the SEC by filing an abbreviated Form ADV Part 1 completing only Items 1 (Identifying Information), 2.B (SEC Reporting by Exempt Reporting Advisers), 3 (Form of Organization), 6 (Other Business Activities), 7 (Financial Industry Affiliations), 10 (Control Persons), 11 (Disclosure Information), and any corresponding section of Schedules A, B, C and D. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires federal regulators to “prescribe regulations or guidelines to require each covered financial institution to disclose to the appropriate Federal regulator the structures of all incentive-based compensation arrangements offered by such covered financial institutions sufficient to determine whether the compensation structure: (A) provides an executive officer, employee, director, or principal shareholder of… [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:02 pm by FDABlog HPM
Patent No. 5,196,404 (“the ‘404 patent”) covering The Medicines Company’s (“MDCO’s”) ANGIOMAX (bivalirudin) – an order from the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am by jgabryno
The budget foresees spending about $4 billion over the next five years to maintain the U.S. bomber industrial base, study plans for a possible new bomber, and upgrade existing B-2 and B-52 bombers. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:56 am by David Aronberg
As our personal injury lawyers understand, due to their injuries, the women filed negligence lawsuits against (a) the Florida Dept. of Transportation; (b) the company which maintains the express lanes; and (c) the driver of the Toyota which caused the accident. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:48 am by Alain Leibman
The court had two curt responses: (a) its holding was not unforeseeable in light of Chiarella; and (b) the failure to disclose is not illegal unless accompanied by an intent to defraud. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 5:08 am by Robin Shea
At the very least, this means (a) documenting the complaint, (b) investigating the allegation and documenting your investigation, and (c) getting back to the employee with your findings and documenting that discussion. [read post]