Search for: "English v. English"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2011, 3:22 am
NMCCA has this as United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:12 am
AFCCA was referring to Graves v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:05 am
Related posts:Tick, Tock: Temporal Application of the Rome II Regulation Referred to the CJEU Two recent decisions of the English High Court consider the... [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:25 am
Relying on article VII of the NYC, the Court was able to bypass the ground for non-recognition under article V 1 (e) – noting that such ground does not exist in the French arbitration law. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
Deprivation of liberty in care standards cases: Cheshire West and Chester Council v P The long awaited Court of Appeal judgement in Cheshire West and Chester Council v P has finally come out. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:31 pm
The M/ V Cape Flattery had run aground on a submerged coral reef off Hawaii; the vessel entered into a salvage agreement with Titan Maritime that contained an arbitration clause: “Any dispute arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in London . . .in accordance with the English Arbitration Act 1996 . . ., English law and practice to apply. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 9:39 pm
If this Kat were not busying himself tomorrow (Tuesday, that is) in chairing the IP Finance seminar on FRAND licensing, he would be beetling over to the very comfy London office of Allen & Overy, in Bishops Square, to enjoy a rapid response seminar on the UK Supreme Court's extremely recent ruling in Human Genome Sciences v Eli Lilly (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
We have had previous posts on the cases of Robins v Kordowski [2011] EWHC 981 (QB)) (seehere), Awdry, Bailey and Douglas v Kordowksi, Farrall v Kordowksi [2010] EWHC 2436 (QB) (see here), Phillips v Kordowski and Mazzola v Kordowski. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm
The answer is unclear because of the traditional insistence in English law that failure of consideration must be “total”, although there are signs (disputed by some) in recent years that this requirement is honoured more in its breach than in its observance (see for example the Privy Council in Goss v Chilcott, the Court of Appeal in Rover v Cannon [1989] 1 WLR 912 and the High Court in Giedo van der Garde v Force India Formula One Team). [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:54 am
It was only in 1996, in the celebrated case Common Cause v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
This blog’s Amy Howe explains the Court’s orders in plain English. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:26 am
It seems possible that the Circuit Court will now ask both sides in the federal case of Perry v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
432/09, Airfield NV, Canal Digitaal BV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (Sabam) and Airfield NV v Agicoa Belgium BVBA. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 1:50 am
This case serves as a reminder that the English courts have a tendency to construe any clauses which lessen the perceived draconian effects of the remedies for breach of warranty and misrepresentation and non-disclosure in favour of insureds. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
Such is the case of Golan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
As the Supreme Court said in Eldred v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 6:24 am
Z v Z [2011] EWHC 2878 (Fam) is, I believe, the first reported pre-nuptial agreement case since Radmacher v Granatino.The facts: Both parties are French. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:50 am
Judicial reticence is typical of English law, which shies away from grand statements of principle, preferring instead an attitude of pragmatism. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:00 am
” , or phrases a new meaning, Medimmune, Inc. v. [read post]
