Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 15,524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 10:40 am
One of the most memorable examples was his asking, in the lead dissent in McCleskey v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
sent me: The Supreme Court’s recent decision in American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am
Gorski v. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 9:29 pm
It’s interesting to contrast the UK Red Bus decision with the recent controversial US 2nd Circuit decision in Cariou v. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:38 am
Booth v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 4:20 pm
NSAEFF v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm
DISINCENTIVES TOWARDS INNOCENCE: A LOOK AT WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS IN THE ONTARIO CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM (Sean Robichaud, 2004)* * This is an older paper written many years ago. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 1:24 am
******************************************Do you remember Cases T-604/11 and T-292/12 Mega Brands International v OHIM, Diset? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH) . [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:06 pm
Rather, it is the Ninth Circuit’s recent ruling in Keller v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:26 am
Birss J held that a double patenting objection could be taken as a ground for refusing a post-grant amendment to a claim but only in the following circumstances:(ii) The two patents have the same priority dates and are held by the same applicant (or its successor in title);(ii) The two claims must have the same scope;(iii) The two claims must be independent claims;(iv) If the objection arises in the Patents Court and both patents are before the court, it can be cured by amending either… [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 11:01 am
Zacchini v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:57 am
A long analysis of this subject was done by Justice Lebedeff in In Re Entertainment Partners Group, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Even if a court were willing to so inquire, moreover, it is very difficult to figure out what kind of evidence one would need to “prove” that someone is being insincere. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:43 am
Box Acquisitions, LLC d/b/a Box Partners, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Fisher’s lawyers had taken her constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court, arguing that the university had not justified the race-conscious part of its admissions plan that it adopted in the wake of the 2003 decision by the Justices in a University of Michigan Law School case (Grutter v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 12:16 pm
Horton, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:41 am
Sabatino Bianco MD v. [read post]
