Search for: "First Choice Security"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 11,820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 4:06 am
From the headline (“Exposing the NSA: A Public Service Worthy of a Pulitzer Prize: The national-security state and its apologists don’t see it that way—which is why we have the First Amendment”), I learned that the Constitution has a special provision to protect democracy against people like me. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:08 am
Given a relatively costless choice like, say, going to an AALS panel on law school reform or hanging out in the hotel lobby, a substantial number will still choose the latter option. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:02 am
Those examples, obviously repugnant to the First Amendment, should not face relaxed review just because Congress used the “securities” label. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
Ditto Al-Hawsawi’s counsel, Walter Ruiz—who says he first learned of the FBI visit on Saturday. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 6:41 am
MVPee.com is giving out 1,000 “Abolish the IRS” apple scented urinal screens FREE to the first 1,000 peopl [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
Ben and Bobby then followed up with a veritable treasure trove of audio from a recent conference, “The National Security Agency at a Crossroads. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:37 am
Richard Clarke argues in the same vein, but with some caveats: “If the U.S. government knows of a vulnerability that can be exploited, under normal circumstances, its first obligation is to tell U.S. users. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Timm, 502 U.S. 410 (1992) to prohibiting the strip-down of partially secured first mortgages in Chapter 7. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:11 am
The choice as to when you should start receiving Social Security retirement benefits can be effected by many things. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
DEVON CONDOMINIUM B ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee. 4th District.Contempt -- Civil -- Where court found defendant in contempt for failing to file fact information sheet as required by court order, it was an abuse of discretion to impose a per diem fine as a coercive civil sanction without giving defendant a reasonable time to purge its contempt and without considering defendant's ability to pay the sanctionCREATIVE CHOICE HOMES, II, LTD., etc., Appellant, vs. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:35 pm
Yet, Professor Tong also described the first of what will be a longer set of deviations between Western and Chinese notions of separation of powers--Sun Yat-sen's proposal that governmental authority be divided not in the usual way--between executive, legislative and judicial authority--but rather that it be organized in five functional categories. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Applying the first prong, the FAA does not specifically relate to the business of insurance—the FAA applies to the enforcement of arbitration agreements generally. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:07 am
The “right to leave” argument was first litigated in the early 1970s when airport security screening was new. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:45 am
Maybe it's just me but I believe that when you CHOOSE to live in a security estate, you do so willingly with a clear concept of the fact that your security and chosen lifestyle comes with certain restrictions. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:02 am
Larger firms who survive will have no choice but to employ in-house advocates and exploit a modest profit margin to offset losses elsewhere. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
The overdraft is secured by the customer’s next direct deposit onto their Netspend card, and is deducted when that direct deposit comes in. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 6:43 am
In the first part of this two-part post, we examined the development of, and practical challenges facing businesses implementing, IoT solutions. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 10:38 am
According to the Post, Clapper is the first senior intelligence official to publicly admit to what declassified documents earlier had revealed to be true. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 1:12 pm
Crime reduction has given a more secure life to every American, but has especially helped the disadvantaged. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
First, at least one court within the same jurisdiction opposes its reasoning. [read post]