Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 9,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2007, 5:31 am
So the TDRA, for example, is a top-down attempt to push judges to do more. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In any event, requiring standing for IPR would just shift challenges to reexamination, and the AIA was designed to replace that practice. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The Kansas Supreme Court rejected an attempt in another sperm donor case, In re K.M.H., to give the provision something other than its obvious meaning. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:00 pm
His Honour Judge Bellamy’s criticism at paragraph 193 of L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) of The Daily Telegraph’s Christopher Booker’s reporting of the case as “unbalanced, inaccurate and just plain wrong”, a criticism supported by Sir Nicholas Wall in X, Y, and Z & Anor v A Local Authority[2011] EWHC 1157 (Fam) at paragraph 102. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In any event, requiring standing for IPR would just shift challenges to reexamination, and the AIA was designed to replace that practice. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 7:07 am
Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 (1992) These plans are designed this way to encourage workers to save for retirement. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Obama - Care The gorilla in the room is litigation concerning the healthcare law (designated derisively by some as “Obama Care” but we in Massachusetts really know it more by its original name: “Romney Care”). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
Both of these posts report that cameras in court are unlikely to be dramatic, focussing on judges, rather than defendants or witnesses (who may, after all, be less willing to give evidence if they are being broadcast). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
The trademark case was initiated due to VIP Products’ sales of a dog chew toy labeled “Bad Spaniels,” designed as a parody of Jack Daniel’s famous whiskey bottle. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
What they’re trying to gain here is an expansion of trade mark law. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:24 pm
” Only leaks, he argues, have the potential to overcome the otherwise unresolved tensions over disclosure of national security information that are the legacy of our constitutional design. [read post]
18 May 2016, 4:18 pm
Look how they’re defined in 15 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:45 am
Senior District Judge Dickinson Debevoise ruled the plaintiffs suffered an ascertainable loss because they bought vehicles designed to last 20 or more years, while the Tele-Aid emergency system became useless after 2007, due to a change in FCC regulations. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
A federal judge stepped in to block the state passed and signed emergency budget effort. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
The sentence (assuming we’re sticking to the presumptive range) will be either 5–15 months or 6–17 months. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
In re Sharp 15-646Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 1:27 am
In its June 7, 2012 opinion written by Judge Michael Boudin for a three-judge panel that included retired Supreme Court Justice David Souter sitting by designation, the First Circuit affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of the case, saying that “we conclude that the complaint was deficient but regard the materiality issue as a close call and rest instead on the failure of the complaint to plead facts justifying a reasonable inference of scienter. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:56 am
As others have noted on this blog, Barrett sought to re-brand the MQD as a “common sense” linguistic doctrine that helps readers find the semantic meaning of statutes rather than a substantive one that gives judges license to depart from it. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am
Federal Judge Shifts eDiscovery Cost in Potential Class Action - http://bit.ly/PBEZGU (Saranac Hale Spencer) Predictive Coding v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:29 am
In Re Anastaplo, 366 US 82 (1961), Mr. [read post]
