Search for: "Judge v. United States" Results 7861 - 7880 of 35,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2021, 7:05 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Tigar of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, issued an order yesterday granting class certification in Lindsay Aberin, et al., v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:05 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
Tigar of the United States District Court, Northern District of California, issued an order yesterday granting class certification in Lindsay Aberin, et al., v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
District Court Judge who has the case raised a critical issue sua sponte (on her own).The issue she raised was the issue of jurisdiction:  Federal question jurisdiction clearly did not exist in this case because, as Wikipedia notes, federal question jurisdiction exists only when “the plaintiff has alleged a violation of the United States Constitution, federal law, or a treaty to which the United States is a party. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:24 am by Bill Raftery
Constitution to states for ratification In deciding cases under the Constitution and Laws of the United States, the Supreme Court of the United States and all other federal courts exercising authority under Article III of the United States Constitution shall strictly construe the enacted text of any constitutional provision and any statute or other law in interpreting or applying the law of the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The opinion’s unprecedented application of heightened scrutiny to a peremptory strike of a juror who was perceived to be gay bears significant implications for the same-sex marriage debate and for other laws that may give rise to distinctions based on sexual orientation.Indeed, today’s opinion is the only appellate decision since United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:01 am by INFORRM
   It has recently been announced that on 4 October 2010, the Grand Chamber panel of 5 judges rejected the State’s request for a referral in this case. [read post]