Search for: "Levell v. State"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 29,839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm
Alabama and Alabama Democratic Conference v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Wetlands can be regulated at the federal, state, and municipal levels. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:59 am
FEC dealt with federal laws and elections, but the “vast majority” of elections are held at state and local levels, AP reports. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:32 pm
” In G.S. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 2:36 pm
(The leading case on this is D.C. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm
Mission Bay Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
John Fund Decision: Aaron Streett, who argued the Halliburton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 7:37 pm
See, Vansteenkiste v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Rather than simply state that forseeability requires more than awareness of a potentially dangerous mental state, that there must be some prior conduct by the son that at least remotely approaches this level of violence toward non-family; the court explores more deeply the factors stated in Rowland v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
Here are the facts of Tate v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:14 am
In US v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 7:48 am
This case has been kicking up and down the federal system for quite a while, and has had several stops at the circuit level. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm
See Starr v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
"*Salvador alleged that Ross violated the law by permitting the late submission of numerous tax assessment complaints and by "allowing," and then implementing, a settlement which itself violated statutory law and public policy.The Appellate Division said that Salvador's allegations, even if accepted as true, "do not remotely rise to the level required for removal pursuant to Public Officers Law §36. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Hopefully, more states will follow (and expand!) [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 1:05 pm
Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:35 am
In Murray v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:31 pm
See Scott v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 4:41 am
Briefly: In The New York Times, Adam Liptak looks at Gill v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:40 am
The level of popular and official venom is so high on this matter that it dwarfs the evidence of "a bare desire to harm" that animated the Court's conclusions in Moreno or Romer v. [read post]
