Search for: "Long v State"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 45,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
The first case I think is highly relevant is the 1975 California Supreme Court decision of Li v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
In United States of America v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:08 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 10:00 pm
Today there are 153 states parties; the United States is not among them.... 2005, in Roper v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 11:05 am
Law Lessons from Lee v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:04 am
The decision effectively extended to juvenile LWOP the long-standing rule for capital cases for adults. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:59 am
Although the formulation of what is required to properly reserve jurisdiction is stated a little differently in different parts of the appellate opinion, the opinion concludes with indicating that the trial court was required to have made a determination in 1990 regarding the Wife's need for and entitlement to alimony, or to at least have awarded "nominal" alimony (e.g. $1 per month), and also to have set out some appropriate duration for how long it was reserving… [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:17 am
Abbott v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 3:47 am
Williams v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 9:13 am
Case citation: Capital Records LLC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 11:13 am
[Post by Venkat] Kleffman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Missouri has the power to withhold state assistance, “but the means it uses to achieve its ends must be [, as the Court observed in McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Much of the news coverage of the Court focuses on yesterday’s grants: In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
USA v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:09 pm
Circuit Judge Maryanne Trump Barry said in Capato v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:50 am
Joe Mullin, an IP Law & Business reporter, has an excellent series of posts on his The Prior Art blog discussing the Harris v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 12:27 pm
In today’s case (Cheema v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:06 pm
Goyal v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:09 pm
[Post by Venkat] Abbas v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:30 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court put its money where its mouth was in terms of federalism doctrine in its landmark decision about the Affordable Care Act (ACA), in NFIB v. [read post]
