Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 7861 - 7880 of 19,803
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The NLRB, however, included this demand in its subpoena (available in full here): If any document responsive to any request herein was withheld from production on the asserted ground that it is privileged, identify and describe the following: (a) author; (b) recipient; (c) date of original document; (d) subject matter of the document; and (e) nature of the privilege asserted. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
The NLRB, however, included this demand in its subpoena (available in full here): If any document responsive to any request herein was withheld from production on the asserted ground that it is privileged, identify and describe the following: (a) author; (b) recipient; (c) date of original document; (d) subject matter of the document; and (e) nature of the privilege asserted. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Jamie Markham
If the shared jail credit does not exceed the time the defendant must serve on the sentence to which it is assigned, then it generally doesn’t matter which one you assign it to. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:11 pm by Jamie Markham
If the shared jail credit does not exceed the time the defendant must serve on the sentence to which it is assigned, then it generally doesn’t matter which one you assign it to. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 6:37 am
’ S.W. testified that he felt `[t]hreatened’ by the incident. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am by Amy Howe
In the end, though, it’s not clear that the rule will matter, if the justices don’t agree that the Border Patrol agent can be sued in federal court at all. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 10:57 am by Daniel Shaviro
How about as a matter of U.S. income tax law and politics, looking forward? [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:52 am by Romano Beitsma
In this opposition appeal the appellant (opponent) argued that the new main request filed during the oral proceedings should not be admitted because its subject-matter should not be considered as a convergent development from the subject-matter of the earlier filed requests. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Indeed, §113(b), by making clear that the owner of the copyright in technical drawings can’t prevent making the articles, “recognizes that such derivative use may otherwise be protected by the copyright laws. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 3:58 am by Matthew Dresden
I wish them well, but am going to assume that they have a Plan B. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:02 am by MBettman
McGowan’s wrongful discharge claim as a matter of law for failure to establish the clarity element. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
She was remarkably uninterested why, in the purported alphabetizing of the documents that were labeled “C,” she never saw any “alphabetized” list that included A, B, or D documents. [read post]