Search for: "Million v State" Results 7861 - 7880 of 24,662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2018, 7:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Further, the settlement value of the top ten settlements in government enforcement cases jumped dramatically – from $52.3 million in 2016 to $485.25 million in 2017. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
  In a shareholder derivative action, a 25% shareholder obtained for the corporation’s benefit a post-trial judgment for over $5 million against the 75% shareholder which was affirmed on appeal in early 2015. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:16 am
Haddad, et al., (Complaint, United States District Court for Connecticut, 18-CV-00055), the SEC  alleges that Haddad operated Trafalgar Square Risk Management, LLC and New England RE, LLC and that he raised at lease $2.5 million from 29 investors through the offer and sale of unregistered securities in each company. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:14 am
, (Complaint, United States District Court for Connecticut, 18-CV-00055), the SEC  alleges that Haddad operated Trafalgar Square Risk Management, LLC and New England RE, LLC and that he raised at least $2.5 million from 29 investors through the offer and sale of unregistered securities in each company. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:00 am by Garrett Hinck
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia Barrister Lloyd Rayney was awarded a total of Aus$2.62 million in his libel action against the State of Western Australia (the judgment on liability and general damages can be found here [2017] WASC 367). [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 11:29 am by Jordan Brunner
  ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Elena Chachko summarized Alyan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Husted v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 8:32 am by Laura Jehl and Stephanie Malaska
While the order concluded that the summons satisfied a “legitimate purpose” and (mostly) sought “information relevant to that purpose” under the Powell test (United States v. [read post]