Search for: "Organ v. State" Results 7861 - 7880 of 23,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
Accordingly, the employer’s petition for review was denied and the Board’s cross-application for enforcement was granted (Novato Healthcare Center v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 6:00 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
It will always be an issue of what is best for employees v. what is in the best interest of the employers business. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 9:18 am by Kevin Milewski
This Monday, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard oral argument in Force v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Freedom from Religion Foundation, which left in place a lower-court ruling that prohibits a New Jersey county from spending public funds to preserve historic churches, arguing that “[n]o state official should discriminate against people of faith, or the religious organizations they operate, based merely on their religious status. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
This is significant because section 715.32(3) prevents the prosecutor from considering the national economic interest in deciding whether to offer an opportunity to negotiate a remediation agreement: Despite paragraph (2)(i), if the organization is alleged to have committed an offence under section 3 or 4 of the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, the prosecutor must not consider the national economic interest, the potential effect on relations with a state other than… [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:02 pm
“This extension will permit us to conduct a careful review of the right to bring action under Title III in light of the national interests of the United States and efforts to expedite a transition to democracy in Cuba,” the State Department said. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:00 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
It also dismissed the complaint against the state appellees after concluding that, under United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Why fuss and suss complicated immigration law issues when there were “sexier” antitrust, intellectual property, organized crime, and other more intellectually-stimulating, and career-enhancing cases to pursue or defend? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:36 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
  Why fuss and suss complicated immigration law issues when there were “sexier” antitrust, intellectual property, organized crime, and other more intellectually-stimulating, and career-enhancing cases to pursue or defend? [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:42 am by Howard Knopf
It may be that the statutory scheme’s focus on regulating the actions of collective organizations, and the case law’s focus on ensuring that such organizations do not devolve into “instruments of oppression and extortion” (Vigneux v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Amy Howe
” Today, the justices agreed to decide in Iancu v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Letters Blogatory, Ted Folkman discusses last week’s opinion in Jam v. [read post]