Search for: "R. B."
Results 7861 - 7880
of 55,746
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2019, 1:45 pm
The NIU will be holding a Faculty Works-in-Progress Conference at the Intelligence Community Campus-Bethesda (ICC-B) facility in Bethesda, Maryland on Thursday, June 20, 2019. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 9:50 am
Similarly, if Group A is doing well, it must be at the expense of B, C, and D. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
In 1972, a 4-1-4 Supreme Court decision said "yes" in federal cases, no in state cases; the Supreme Court will now reconsider it.The case is Ramos v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
The court noted that, under Pa.R.C.P. 237.3(b)(2), if a Petition to Open a Default Judgment is filed within ten (10) days after the entry of the default judgment, the court “shall” open the judgment if the proposed Answer states a meritorious defense. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:13 am
While incontrovertible proof of fraud is not required at the pleading stage, CPLR 3016[b] mandates particularity such that elementary facts from which misconduct may be inferred must be stated (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, supra). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:58 am
But (B) is extremely vaguely written and could subject many medium or large (and even some small) businesses to the CCPA’s reach. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am
Trainers’ activities permissible under B-1 visas. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
Failure to maintain equipment, containers and utensils used to convey and hold food in a manner that protects against contamination as required by 21 CFR 110.80(b)(7). [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:32 am
The rule of law objection to vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned:"Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:34 pm
Posted by Edmund R. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:53 pm
If sections 1 to 7 of this title apply to such conduct only because of the operation of paragraph (1) (B), then sections 1 to 7 of this title shall apply to such conduct only for injury to export business in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 3:53 pm
If sections 1 to 7 of this title apply to such conduct only because of the operation of paragraph (1) (B), then sections 1 to 7 of this title shall apply to such conduct only for injury to export business in the United States. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:59 pm
§ 2707(b). [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 7:19 am
Wallace alleges that when her employment was terminated, the CHRO “falsely stated” that Wallace had “deliberately violated policies on the use of [her] state email account and the state network, by sending numerous non-business related emails;” (b) “on multiple occasions and in voluminous amount in violation of C.G.S. 46a-83(J) [she] had released to Miguel Escalera . . . information on active CHRO cases;” and (c) “that [she] had acted in an… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
Karl R. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:26 am
As set forth in part in the DOJ Release: [B]eginning in and around September, 2014, and continuing until in and around October, 2017, Sarah M. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
., to support an award of 24 months’ of notice, for a far more junior and short serviced employee nearing the age of retirement.Paul Adam: Well, this is a bold decision with some very bold language.As Simran mentioned, the conventional wisdom has generally been that there is a “soft cap” of 24 months on notice, if the employee was at the highest levels of seniority, when four key "Bardal factors" are… [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 5:29 pm
These clauses are contained in Google’s “Terms of Use” (“conditions d’utilisations”) and “Confidentiality Policy” (“Règles de confidentialité”). [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:25 pm
You should have an agreement that says, “We are each individually responsible for debt incurred during the marriage without contribution from the other spouse unless: (a) the debt was joint; or, (b) there is a signed document saying we are treating it as joint. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:18 pm
The Government motion for debate was: “That this house: (1) notes the resolutions of the House of 12 and 13 March, and accordingly agrees that the Government will seek to agree with the European Union an extension of the period specified in Article 50(3); (2) agrees that, if the House has passed a resolution approving the negotiated withdrawal agreement and the framework for the future relationship for the purposes of section 13(1)(b) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 by 20… [read post]
