Search for: "STATE v COUNTS"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 17,258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2007, 8:56 am
Based on that approach, the Court forbid the death penalty for the mentally retarded and juveniles in large part by head-counting state legislatures and concluding that they were moving in the direction of abolishing those practices. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:50 am
That application (North Carolina v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:16 am
Busk foreclosed the employees’ state-law claims (Miranda v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:31 am
The Panel faults the lawyer on two counts. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:30 am
That changed on March 2, 2010 when the United States Supreme Court decided Reed Elsevier, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Last week, in Hendrix v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Last week, in Hendrix v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 4:48 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
Carr v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
See State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 8:24 am
Environmental Protection Agency, where Roberts would have saved the EPA from the state's lawsuit to force it to deal with global warming, and Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 1:40 pm
From Illoominate Media, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
First up is Currier v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
The Fourth District suggested at some length that the “no set of circumstances test” was vague, difficult to apply, and that it wasn’t entirely clear that even the United States Supreme Court truly adhered to it anymore, citing Washington State Grange v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 9:02 am
In TNS Media Research, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 10:28 am
With those aliens counted, a state’s population can increase to the point that it gains seats, at the expense of a state — like Louisiana — with comparatively few such immigrants. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:09 am
Therefore, given his failure to administratively exhaust his claim, the Court finds Count II is due to be dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
