Search for: "STATE v. SMALL" Results 7861 - 7880 of 16,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The opinion was delivered in Voisine v. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
The opinion was delivered in Voisine v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:25 pm
On the same day that the Supreme Court seemed to rely on common sense in its approach in the KSR decision, it handed down its holding in Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:12 am by GuestPost
Attacks upon the State itself when they succeed cease to be within the scope of the criminal law. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Sophia Gaulkin
Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Wickard v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Well, buck up, Sparky, because after 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 12:00 pm by Giles Peaker
James v Hertsmere Borough Council (2020) EWCA Civ 489 What can be addressed in a section 204 Housing Act 1996 appeal of a review decision? [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:54 am
Based on opinion polls, that is already the punishment of choice for the public, and that is the typical punishment that all but a small percentage of people convicted of murder receive. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
Here are a smattering of those concurrences in cases large and small: Trump v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:53 pm
New Cinular Wireless Services), and the Washington Supreme Court's July 12 holding that Cingular's class-action ban was unenforceable against a consumer class action under Washington state law (Scott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 10:41 am by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), which authorizes the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]