Search for: "State v House" Results 7861 - 7880 of 28,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
This judge began his analysis of the motion by noting that to “`“state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements: (1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of State law. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:00 pm
Although preemption by the 1976 Copyright Act was touched upon, Judge Castel pointed out that the House Report, accompanying the 1976 Act, expressly states that hot news misappropriation was a branch of the unfair competition doctrine that was not preempted. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:49 am by Giles Peaker
Collingwood v Carillon House Eastbourne Ltd (LANDLORD AND TENANT – SERVICE CHARGES – consultation requirements) (2021) UKUT 246 (LC) There were two issues in this appeal. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:20 am
“The state response is out of all proportion to the state objectives,” the judges wrote. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:27 am by Adam Wagner
Luton Borough Council & Nottingham City Council & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 217 (Admin) (11 February 2011) – Read judgment The high court has ruled that the coalition government’s cancellation of Labour’s school building program in 6 areas was unlawful. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Moreover, as a savvy investor, Paulson only wanted to bet against the securities with the greatest risk of default, those full of:   borrowers with low credit scores, variable mortgages, and mortgages issued in states already beginning to suffer the worst of the housing crisis. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 11:17 am by Garrett Hinck
The Supreme Court stayed the Ninth Circuit’s September 7 decision in Hawaii v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 10:19 am by Garrett Hinck
Harry Graver summarized the briefs and oral arguments in Dalmazzi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]