Search for: "State v. C. S."
Results 7861 - 7880
of 37,717
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
In 2012, in a case called Miller v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 11:17 am
Carlie C's Operation Center, Inc. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 9:56 am
” The recent judgment of 12 September 2019 (case C-688/12, Bayer Pharma AG v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:52 am
From Garner v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:21 am
NPQCarrie Garber Siegrist: New: If #taxexempt org relied on Rev Proc 2018-38 & did not identify its donors on #Form990 #ScheduleB: Penalty relief Notice 2019-47 may help w/ potential sec. 6652(c) penalties due to 7/30/19 Bullock v @IRSnews order setting aside 2018-38. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 3:45 pm
§ 106.41(c). [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 1:36 pm
United States, No. 19-931 C (Fed. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am
We could only resist the attacks of the state. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:45 pm
For example in 2012, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal addressed this issue in Pierre Domville v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 10:22 am
On Sept. 25, 2019, in Logan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 10:22 am
On Sept. 25, 2019, in Logan v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
However, such a result is possible: in O’Brien v Ministry of Justice ECJ C-393/10 (01 March 2012), the Supreme Court held that a judge was a ‘worker’ for the purposes of EU law (specifically the Part-Time Workers Framework Directive 97/81/EC). [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 6:05 am
The Delaware Court of Chancery’s recent decision, Genuine Parts Company v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
On 24 September 2019 the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave two judgments (Cases C-507/17 and C-136/17) ruling that: (i) de-referencing by Google should be limited to EU Member States’ versions of its search engine with some important qualifications; and (ii) when Google receives a request for de-referencing relating to a link to a web page on which sensitive data are published, a balance must be sought between the fundamental rights of the person… [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
Supreme Court in Luce v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:25 pm
[iii] United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 2:00 pm
Additionally, the notice letter is supposed to provide information advising the individual or entity of their right to appeal their inclusion on the list.[7] V. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
§2031.210(a)(3) and (c). [read post]
