Search for: "State v. Liberty" Results 7861 - 7880 of 9,941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
As the human rights organisation Liberty have pointed out, the newspaper was never a fan of New Labour’s Human Rights Act. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am by INFORRM
As the human rights organisation Liberty have pointed out, the newspaper was never a fan of New Labour’s Human Rights Act. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:31 pm by Berin Szoka
One attendee joked that we’d have to devote the entire state of Montana just to house all the necessary server farms. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
El Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos determinó en Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:36 am by Matthew Flinn
The issue of publicity more generally, and the issue of parties to an Inquiry being able to cross-examine witnesses, was addressed to some extent by the Court of Appeal in R (D) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2006] EWCA Civ 143, albeit in the context of an investigation into a death in custody under Article 2 of the ECHR. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 12:34 am by Lucy
The second was a Scottish case, Lyons v Board of the State Hospital [2011] ScotCS CSOH_21, where patients in the state hospital challenged a policy that banned their visitors from bringing them food gifts and the patients from ordering takeaway. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 1:10 pm
In 1972, the Supreme Court, in a landmark judgment (State of Punjab v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am by INFORRM
” The ECtHR stated that Article 8 did not apply, as “the underlying reasons for the applicant’s dismissal from work were sufficiently linked to his private life. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Free Access to Legal Information: Roles in the expansion of liberty, the rule of law and democracy, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London. 25 -29 January 2012. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:23 am by Lyle Denniston
Significantly, the Department, in the new document filed Tuesday night, relied upon several laws Congress passed to try to block Guantanamo prisoners entirely from the federal courts –  laws that remain on the books even after the Supreme Court, in the decision in Boumediene v. [read post]