Search for: "State v. Race"
Results 7861 - 7880
of 8,740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2025, 9:05 pm
President & Fellows of Harvard College and SFFA v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 8:22 am
And race matters (a lot). [read post]
23 Feb 2025, 8:00 am
Bakke (1978) Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:43 pm
[3] See Jones v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
Cherepanov v. [read post]
28 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In Primexx Energy Opportunity Fund, LP v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am
"] From West v. [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
When President Donald Trump signed the Prioritizing Military Excellence Order, questions arose as to whether it would be a complete transgender service ban or a variation of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell regime. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 10:06 am
By Colleen V. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:17 am
v=4K5fbQ1-zps Some took 16 steps forward, some took zero, I took four (but not for the stuff in parentheses). [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
14 May 2025, 9:30 am
As ostensibly private law arrangements, racial covenants escaped constitutional constraints until 1948, when Shelley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
When it comes to other issues involving the separation of church and state, the administration supported the state of Maine’s right to refuse funding for religious education in a recent Supreme Court case. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
California, for example, has established itself as implementer-friendly court and if this pattern continues it is likely that there will be a race for everyone to go to these more favourable courts rather than acting reasonably initially and negotiating the terms. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
See The Race, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
A divided Supreme Court created the "contributing factor" test for Title VII claims (race, gender, religion and national origin discrimination) in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
See The Race, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 5:37 pm
V) MALVEAUX: Congressman Clyburn earlier said today, "I think he can afford to tone it down. [read post]
