Search for: "State v. Register" Results 7861 - 7880 of 13,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2017, 8:36 am by Peter Klose
(i) For purposes of this contract, the term “Institutional Lender” shall mean any bank, savings bank, private banker, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union or similar banking institution whether organized under the laws of this state, the United States or any other state, foreign banking corporation licensed by the Superintendent of Banks of New York or regulated by the Comptroller of the Currency to transact business in New York… [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
The states were only just beginning to require the official registration of births; in North Carolina, where many children labored in textile mills, fewer than one percent of births were registered. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 3:17 pm by Michael Kaplen
    Executive Director, Brain Injury Association of New York State  > Helen Bibawy, CBIS    FACTS Coordinator, Brain Injury Association of New York State To register on line, go to the brain injury association of new york state website. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:18 am by Scott Bomboy
Richardson, permitted states also to use registered voters who were citizens to determine a legislative district. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Jeralyn
Binyam's background: In July of 2002, Ethiopian native Binyam Mohamed was taken from Pakistan to Morocco on a Gulfstream V aircraft registered with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) as N379P. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
Accordingly, we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment against the State. 08a0105p.06 Floyd v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:07 am
According to the Supreme Court, this approach is confirmed by the CJEU decision in the Budweiser case (Budějovický Budvar v Anheuser-Busch, case C-482/09), where the Court laid down that "the prerequisite for the running of [the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence is], first, registration of the later trade mark in the Member State concerned". [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Southern Snow Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:53 am
 This argument formed the basis of the dissent to one of the key cases the FBI relies upon,  United States v New York Telephone Co., 434 US159 (1977). [read post]