Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 7861 - 7880 of 8,932
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Goalless draws and penalty shoot-outs - Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (IPKat) PPL's efforts to secure via Copyright Tribunal appropriate licence fees from bars, cafes, shops and offices frustrated by Tribunal's 'one-size-fits-all' fee ruling (1709 Copyright Blog) Charity chips and dodgy patent claims - ActionAid's unsuccessful patent application (IPKat) United States US General USPTO schedules roundtable discussion on… [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
See, e.g., Lockheed Martin Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:30 am
”  The plaintiffs defined their putative class as including “all governmental entities in the United States of America who have been caused to expend monies" for certain drugs as a "result of the off label promotion by the defendants. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 10:33 am by Joe Mullin
" Any holdups in the case were the results of FireStar's inability to pay and reluctance to make key decisions, like authorizing the hiring of experts, the firm stated in court documents. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
From Russ Bensing at The Briefcase comes the news that Ohio's 8th District Court of Appeals affirmed a suppression motion in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 10:27 am
"G-d protects," he said, "little children, drunkards and the United States of America. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:37 pm
Pros: v. mesmerizing eyes and purr, good manner with patients. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
The evil that Emperor Norton abolished, of course, was the Congress of the United States of America. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 9:05 pm
("TIFD III-E") sued the United States of America to recover approximately $62 million that TIFD III-E deposited with the Internal Revenue Service ("I.R.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:45 am by Susan Brenner
Brief of Plaintiff-Appellee United States of America, U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 12:00 am
Press, 2009).New Video:Citizens United Productions, Rediscovering God in America II: Our Heritage, (2009), reviewed in CNS News. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:40 pm by David M. Goldman
The case has major implications for the legality of restrictive gun laws not only in Chicago, but also in other cities across the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:00 pm
In a departure from the voluntary E-Verify, employers that are a party to a contract (or subcontract) containing this E-Verify clause will be required to use E-Verify to confirm the employment eligibility of all new hires and all employees who perform work directly under the contract.Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]