Search for: "US v. Givens" Results 7861 - 7880 of 51,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
Monsour accounted for the absence of specific computer records showing a manual command was given by explaining that the records show only the activity that resulted in a new URL, and that commands could be sent within an internet program without creating a new URL.State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:07 am by Jonathan H. Adler
That policy has broad ramifications given that 36 States allow medicinal marijuana use and 18 of those States also allow recreational use.5 Given all these developments, one can certainly understand why an ordinary person might think that the Federal Government has retreated from its once-absolute ban on marijuana. . . . [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 9:38 am by Giles Peaker
The notice was statutorily prescribed and the use of an older, pre-2011 version was not acceptable. b) The landlord purported to forfeit on date after the deadline for payment given in the s.166 notice, asserting that some arrears of ground rent had been outstanding for more than three years. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:00 am by Jason Rantanen
  Given these circumstances, the court concluded that Apotex had the necessary specific intent to cause inducement. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 12:31 pm by INFORRM
Judgment The leading judgment was given by Jackson LJ (with whom Ryder and Christopher Clarke LJJ agreed). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Given that Blogmeister Jeremy is attending the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group Conference in Brussels this very week, this Kat thought it prudent to tell you about a recent decision of the General Court of Justice of the European Union involving just that: Cadila Healthcare Ltd v OHIM and Novartis AG (Case T-288/08, 15 March 2012). [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 am
Mabior’s viral counts were lowered by antiretroviral therapy and he occasionally used condoms. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Puerto Rico 2014http://t.co/0yAUYfpV39 -> License restrictions not binding in customers where not given to them Avaya, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:33 am
Those seemed to be some of the implications as the Supreme Court on Tuesday agonized in public over why the legal word "obvious" should not be given an obvious meaning, in the case of KSR International v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 11:35 am
Our adversarial system depends on the principle that all sides to a dispute must be given the opportunity to fully advocate their views of the issues presented in a case. . . . [read post]