Search for: "Branch v. State"
Results 7881 - 7900
of 8,128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2007, 5:50 am
– State-owned or public properties may be leased or sold, by contract ad libitum, to foreign capital invested companies or the operators of establishments built to improve foreign-investment environment who operate the establishments built to improve foreign-investment environment, such as foreign schools and hospitals, and for a lease of a state-owned or public property, the term of the lease can be up to fifty years. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
" County of Sacramento v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 6:25 am
Four years later, the Supreme Court revisited the issue in United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 12:04 am
" Sierra Club v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Cupek v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 5:25 pm
United States. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:32 pm
Texas and Roper v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 2:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Glenn Sulmasy, JAG and law professor at the US Coast Guard academy, and John Yoo have published a new article in the UCLA law review, "Challenges to Civilian Control of the Military: A Rational Choice Approach to the War on Terror," 54 UCLALR 1815 (August 2007). [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
It is the function of the executive branch to carry out the sentences of the courts ofthis State, including executions. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
As Judge Jenkins noted, Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 3:44 am
(Vanguard v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:42 am
Now, however, in Jewish War Veterans of the United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:42 am
Corrie family suit blocked by judges, Seattle Times, Sept. 18, 2007.The case is Corrie v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 3:02 am
The lawsuit entitled People of the State of California v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 10:13 am
The problem is, it probably will result in more litigation.The decision is Fancher v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 6:48 am
Booker and United States v. [read post]
